Anonymous Sources, Invisible Claims, and Comey’s Sworn Testimony?
Former FBI Director James Comey testified under oath May 3rd that the Trump administration had not pressured his agency to halt any investigation for political purposes.
How Will They Twist This Now?
Comey admitted that the FBI has always been free to operate without political interference—flying in the face of Democrats’ delusions about Russia and President Donald J. Trump, and exposing a new political witch hunt by enemies within the president’s own Justice Department.
From The Gateway Pundit
— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) May 17, 2017
Videotaped testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee blows apart the phony narrative New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt wove on Tuesday, which resulted in Mueller’s appointment. Schmidt’s only sources were anonymous. They claimed that on Feb. 14th, the day after National Security Adviser Michael Flynn resigned, Trump had asked Comey to end an investigation into Flynn’s connections to Russia.
Schmidt’s allegations that Trump attempted to obstruct justice hinged on the sources’ accounts of a memo authored the same day. Schmidt, a Democrat party lackey, admitted he hasn’t even seen the document—dated nearly three months before Comey’s testimony that totally contradicts it.
Comey’s statement to Hawaii Democratic Senator Mazie Hirono from May 3rd, which Center for Security Policy analyst Nick Short noted Wednesday, exposes the Democrats once again for their political gamesmanship.”
Lying during sworn congressional testimony is committing perjury, a federal offense punishable by up to five years in prison.”